{"id":24360,"date":"2014-07-25T17:01:12","date_gmt":"2014-07-25T15:01:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.area-arch.it\/floating-green-2\/"},"modified":"2016-03-01T18:27:06","modified_gmt":"2016-03-01T17:27:06","slug":"floating-green","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.area-arch.it\/en\/floating-green\/","title":{"rendered":"Floating Green"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paradoxical green<\/strong>
\nLawn is a visual substitute for soil and mud in an urban environment. It is an all-purpose hatching in urban designer’s \/ planner’s large-scale master plan drawings. But most, if not all, claim “Keep Off!” in reality, and none belong to the domain of public activities. Lawn is benign, salubrious, and controlled. It beats horror, squalidity and uncertainty. Lawn represents social commonweal. It is a strategic battlefield between democracy and power- occupying and covering surfaces with a most democratic method. Lawn is a visual reminder of natural environment in an urban context; however, it is anything but natural. It is an engineered product subjected to the rule of industrial reproduction and genetic engineering. It is produced in patches, cut into uniform squares, transported by trucks, and installed by human labors. Lawn is the most economical and efficient veil in creating a prepossessing urban image. It consumes the least material substance, but covers the largest surface area within the shortest time period. Evidence can be found from Pearl River Delta to Beijing during the Olympic Games.<\/p>\n

\"photo<\/a>
photo by Ling Fan<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Floating green<\/strong>
\n\u201cFloating Green\u201d is a public artwork rethinking this condition. The flat lawn layer is detached from the ground it covers, and folded to create inhabitable urban furniture out of a flat visual icon for urbanization. Its plastic feature invites people to touch, smell, occupy and sense it. The delicate bouncy structure oscillates with joviality when people sitting on it talks, moves and laughs. It is no longer a forbidding symbol of urbanity, but turns to an emotional and sensitive participant in urban life. While an architectural artifact usually seeks singularity and monumentality, a city embraces density and multiplicity. \u201cFloating Green\u201d rejects to be a symbol or a sculpture; instead, it dedicates to create an interactive urban field. The availability and low cost of the material provides the work with the opportunity of mass distribution. \u201cFloating Green\u201d therefore shifts from a particular visual image to a generative system with the potential to produce varied individual pieces and combinations. Some generated urban furniture pieces scatter across the existing green areas in Shanghai Pudong Zhangjiang Hi-tech Park, contributing to a high quality public space with both aesthetic experience and urban function.<\/p>\n